06/04/2025

COLUMN – Journalism vs. Social Media: Fact-Check or Fast-Track?

Misinformation Moves Faster Than Facts

Journalists verify. Social media doesn’t. A catchy headline, true or not, can reach millions before actual reporters even finish fact-checking. The more shocking the post, the further it travels. People react, share, and believe before they even question if they have questions at all. Viral posts shape opinions, but unfortunately lack accuracy, spreading a mess of unchecked half-truths without editors or fact-checkers.

The Danger of the Echo Chamber

Algorithms feed us what we like, not what we need. The most outrageous content spreads the fastest, pushing people further apart. Without different perspectives, critical thinking fades, and we’re stuck in a loop of the same opinions bouncing back at us. Critical thinking takes a hit. As a result, instead of questioning, we consume, and instead of discussing, we argue. Social media turns into a loud, endless debate where no one really listens, only reacts.

Despite the risks, social media also helps journalists verify information. They can check sources, analyse trends, and connect with eyewitnesses in real time. Some news outlets now focus on fact-checking, making sure their stories are accurate before publishing.

The Right Approach

Journalism, first of all, is about truth. Social media is a powerful tool, but it should never replace responsible reporting. Being first means nothing if the news is wrong.

Social media may set the pace, but journalism should set the standard. The real challenge for journalists isn’t being first; it is being right.

 

Text: Anna Tishchenko.

Picture: Techbullion